Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 51241 results

  • Warwickshire County Council (24 008 230)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Transport 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse her a Blue Badge. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • Kent County Council (24 008 252)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint regarding home to school transport for his son. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council, and it has now agreed to a Personal Transport Budget. We could not achieve anything more.

  • Medway Council (24 008 281)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. This is because the Council has already offered Miss X a suitable remedy via its own investigation and there is nothing further we would add or recommend.

  • London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (24 008 306)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about several Penalty Charge Notices that the Council issued. This is because investigation would not lead to a different outcome because the Council has cancelled them and reimbursed fees paid. It is reasonable to expect the complaint to follow the statutory process and appeal to a tribunal to dispute two remining notices.

  • London Borough of Camden (24 008 326)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council handled her application for a disabled parking bay. This is because the Council has already investigated and replied to Ms X, and we could not add anything to that investigation.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (24 008 334)

    Statement Upheld Trees 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing inconsistent instructions to the complainant regarding a hedge overhanging the highway. We are satisfied with the action the Council has already taken, it is reasonable to expect the complainant to have used his right of appeal in the magistrates court, and we will not pursue his concerns about the complaints process in isolation.

  • Harborough District Council (24 008 353)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

  • Westmorland and Furness Council (24 008 361)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council misled him when he made an application to a court about its involvement with his adult son’s education. This is because it was reasonable for Mr X to raise the matter with the courts.

  • London Borough of Lambeth (24 008 403)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We cannot by law investigate this complaint that the Council failed to take action in relation to environmental health issues which affected the complainant’s use and enjoyment of her home. This is because the complainant exercised her right to refer the matter to the magistrates’ court to determine the issues. We have no jurisdiction to investigate in these circumstances. The complaint also raises issues about data protection which we will not investigate as we are not the appropriate body to consider these.

  • Epping Forest District Council (24 008 522)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the handling of his planning application. This is because the injustice he claims stems from the decision to refuse his application and we cannot decide if this was correct. If Mr X had felt the decision was wrong it would have been reasonable for him to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings