Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 55054 results

  • Transport for London (24 021 224)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority’s decision to reject the complainant’s application for a grant under the Scrappage Scheme. This is because the Authority has decided to award the grant and will explore if an additional remedy is needed.

  • West Northamptonshire Council (24 021 254)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

  • Essex County Council (24 010 899)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 11-May-2025

    Summary: Miss X complained about the delay in her son’s (Y) Education Health and Care needs assessment and the Council’s failure to communicate with her. We found fault with the Council. This fault caused injustice to Y and Miss X as there has been uncertainty about the educational support Y needs. Miss X was distressed by the lack of communication from the Council. The Council agreed to apologise, make symbolic payments for the delay and distress and introduce a system of regular communication for the parents and young people waiting for the assessments.

  • Worcestershire Regulatory Services (24 011 258)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her reports of noise nuisance from a local wedding venue. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • Shropshire Council (24 011 876)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 11-May-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained the Council delayed reviewing her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan and failed to provide the Speech and Language Therapist provision from her child’s plan. Mrs X also complained the Council delayed handling her complaint. We found fault with the Council for all aspects of Mrs X’s complaint. The Council agreed to pay Mrs X £2,700 for the quantifiable loss of the Speech and Language Therapist reviews, £300 for the distress and uncertainty caused through delays in reviewing her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan and £100 for the frustration and inconvenience caused through the complaint handling delays.

  • London Borough of Newham (24 014 554)

    Statement Not upheld Homelessness 11-May-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to provide him with interim accommodation when he was evicted without notice. There was no fault in the Council’s actions.

  • Essex County Council (24 021 408)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (24 021 415)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about home to school transport provided by the Council. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.

  • London Borough of Islington (24 021 419)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Cemeteries and crematoria 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about damage caused to a memorial bench near a relative’s grave. This is because Miss X has a right to take the matter to court.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 021 448)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 11-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Councils refusal to provide school transport for the complainant’s child. This is because the Council has decided to offer transport under exceptional circumstances. Therefore further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings