Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 24 results

  • Hambleton District Council (20 011 429)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 17-Oct-2021

    Summary: Mr C says the Council published minutes of a planning meeting which failed to give adequate reasons for the planning committee’s decision to approve a planning application in his village. He says this caused him injustice because his faith in the planning system has been undermined. The Council was not at fault. The minutes were ‘adequate’.

  • Hambleton District Council (21 002 816)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 07-Oct-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for four properties. This is because the complainant has not been caused a significant injustice and there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Hambleton District Council (21 001 872)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 07-Sep-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council allowing pile driving on a development close to the complainant’s home. The Planning Inspector granted planning permission without controls on such activity. Therefore, the Council cannot stop or restrict it.

  • Hambleton District Council (20 013 172)

    Statement Not upheld Other 06-Sep-2021

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application for development on land on the edge of his village. We did not investigate his complaints further because Mr X was not caused a significant injustice or an injustice for which we would recommend a remedy.

  • Hambleton District Council (20 007 691)

    Statement Upheld Noise 04-May-2021

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to take action regarding noise nuisance and wrongly closed his case. Mr X says he continues to suffer from excessive noise. The Council has accepted it wrongly closed the case and has apologised and taken action to prevent similar problems occurring. The Council is currently investigating the ongoing noise problems.

  • Hambleton District Council (19 011 720)

    Statement Upheld Planning applications 21-Jul-2020

    Summary: Mr X complains a planning committee report gave inaccurate information about the distance between his property and a development and failed to properly consider the impact of changes in the land levels. Mr X says his privacy has been affected. The Council accepts the distances quoted were greater than actually exists. It also failed to explain how two storey buildings were acceptable behind his property when bungalows were placed behind his neighbours to reduce adverse overlooking.

  • Hambleton District Council (19 015 320)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 13-Feb-2020

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council failed to consider the privacy of future occupiers when it granted planning permission for play equipment close to new build properties. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint as Mrs X has used a different route to achieve the relocation of the play equipment. Therefore, there is no outstanding personal injustice.

  • Hambleton District Council (19 007 961)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 16-Dec-2019

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council failed to consider the impact on her privacy and amenity when it approved a property with a finished floor level two metres above her property. It was always clear the properties near Mrs X’s would be built at a higher level. The Council did consider this when determining the application. There is no evidence of fault in the process leading to the decision about the height of the finished floor levels and so there is no basis to criticise it.

  • Hambleton District Council (19 008 357)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 16-Dec-2019

    Summary: Mr and Mrs Z complain the Council failed to consider the impact on their privacy and amenity when it approved a property with a finished floor level two metres above their property. It was always clear the properties near Mr and Mrs Z’s would be built at a higher level. The Council did consider this when determining the application. There is no evidence of fault in the process leading to the decision about the height of the finished floor levels and so there is no basis to criticise it.

  • Hambleton District Council (19 008 422)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 16-Dec-2019

    Summary: Mrs Y complains the Council failed to consider the impact on her privacy and amenity when it approved a property with a finished floor level two metres above her property. It was always clear the properties near Mrs Y’s would be built at a higher level. The Council did consider this when determining the application. There is no evidence of fault in the process leading to the decision about the height of the finished floor levels and so there is no basis to criticise it.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings