Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 54734 results

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (24 019 854)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to disclose information about a third party who is a tenant in a property which the complainant owns. It would be reasonable for the complainant to make a formal subject access request and if this is unsuccessful there is another body better placed to consider the matter.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (24 019 866)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Transport 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her blue badge application. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Barnet (24 019 998)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the payment of school transport for Ms X’s child. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

  • Southend-on-Sea City Council (24 020 073)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his application for a vehicle crossover. This is because the complaint is late and I have seen no good reasons for the delay in bringing it to us. There is also not enough evidence of fault by the Council or to show its actions caused Mr X injustice.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (24 010 647)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s handling of his homeless application. We found the Council at fault in that it delayed in making a main housing duty decision and a decision about the suitability of Mr X’s temporary accommodation. These faults caused Mr X distress and the injustice of being unsuitably housed for a year longer than he should have been. The Council has agreed to remedy the injustice by apologising and making Mr X a symbolic payment.

  • Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 010 995)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained that the Council delayed in its decision to refuse to reassess her son, Y’s, special educational needs, and delayed in issuing an amended Education, Health and Care Plan following an annual review. We found fault on the part of the Council which caused injustice to Mrs X and Y in the form of distress and delayed access to suitable educational provision. The Council has agreed to make symbolic payments to remedy the injustice caused.

  • Derbyshire County Council (24 012 164)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council’s actions delayed an Education Health and Care needs assessment. This is because Miss X used her right of appeal to a tribunal and we cannot investigate the actions of the Council during that appeal.

  • Sheffield City Council (24 012 559)

    Statement Not upheld Charging 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: Ms Y complained the Council wrongly decided her late mother, Mrs X, deprived herself of assets to reduce her care fees. The Council made this decision in line with relevant law and guidance without fault.

  • Oadby & Wigston Borough Council (24 013 733)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: Miss X complained about the temporary accommodation provided by the Council. We find no fault in the Council’s decision to issue a warning letter about her behaviour or the placements provided. We do find fault in the Council’s delay responding to concerns about the standard of a temporary accommodation and the events leading her to sleep in her car. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a payment to Miss X.

  • Rother District Council (23 007 587)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 23-Apr-2025

    Summary: Ms X complained about how the Council handled her concerns about breaches of planning and environmental control, and anti-social behaviour by her neighbour since 2021. We found fault by the Council for causing unnecessary delays in the planning enforcement process from Summer 2024. It was not at fault for the delays prior to this, or the other matters complained about as it reached decisions it was entitled to make. The Council should apologise and make payment to Ms X to acknowledge the distress and uncertainty its delays are causing her.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings