Decision search
Your search has 56704 results
-
London Borough of Bromley (25 018 390)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council responded to Mr X’s reports of building waste on his property. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to investigate it now.
-
Hertfordshire County Council (25 018 397)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s defence of a planning appeal hearing. We cannot investigate matters which have been considered by Planning Inspectors or the Secretary of State. Also it is reasonable to expect Mr X to complain to the Information Commissioner if he believes the Council is withholding information which should be available to the public.
-
Blackburn with Darwen Council (25 018 435)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Land 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to sell him and his neighbours a plot of land it owns, and how it dealt with his complaint. There is not enough evidence of fault, nor sufficient significant personal injustice to Mr X caused by the matters complained of, to warrant us investigating. We do not investigate councils’ complaint handling where we are not investigating the core matters giving rise to the complaint.
-
Brighton & Hove City Council (25 018 525)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to not conduct a safeguarding investigation in relation to her late mother’s care at its nursing home. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.
-
London Borough of Brent (25 018 747)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about an incident when the wrong school transport vehicle collected her child. This is because it is unlikely our involvement would add to the Council’s investigation or achieve a different outcome.
-
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 018 921)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s children’s services involvement with his family. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons for us to exercise discretion to consider it now. We will not investigate Mr X’s further complaint about delays in the Council responding to a subject access request and correcting inaccurate records. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider these matters.
-
London Borough of Southwark (25 019 325)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s delay in processing her housing register application. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons for investigating now. In any case, the Council has apologised and made a payment to remedy its delay, and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
-
London Borough of Lewisham (25 019 504)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Transport 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Miss X’s Blue Badge application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault, in the Council’s decision, to justify investigating.
-
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (25 019 559)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s process for managing its Business Rates’ accounts. This is because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions and an investigation by the Ombudsman would unlikely achieve anything more for Mr Y.
-
Kent County Council (25 019 693)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Transport 08-Apr-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Miss X’s Blue Badge application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault, in the Council’s decision, to justify investigating.