Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 56704 results

  • Suffolk County Council (25 009 274)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: The Council was at fault. It did not issue Mrs X’s child, Y’s, decision letter or Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan within the statutory timescales after Y’s annual review. This caused Mrs X distress, uncertainty and delayed her appeal rights to the Tribunal. The Council had already offered to pay Mrs X a suitable symbolic payment before Mrs X came to us. It has repeated that offer. The Council has already put in place an action plan to improve its service.

  • London Borough of Ealing (25 010 602)

    Statement Not upheld Allocations 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council refused to rehouse her family when she told it they were at risk of harm. We do not find the Council at fault when it did not move her to its urgent or other priority housing allocation band.

  • Lincolnshire County Council (25 011 575)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: The Council was at fault for delay reviewing Mrs X’s child’s Education, Health and Care Plan. This caused Mrs X frustration, for which the Council will make a symbolic payment. The Council has already apologised to Mrs X and taken suitable action to prevent similar fault in future.

  • East Riding of Yorkshire Council (25 000 902)

    Statement Not upheld Assessment and care plan 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We have ended this investigation. There was no evidence when Mr X was discharged from hospital, no evidence Mr X was left without adequate care in place when he left hospital and the Council increased Mr X’s care package. There was not enough evidence of fault to investigate further and there was nothing worthwhile we could achieve by continuing to pursue this matter.

  • Liverpool City Council (25 001 561)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: The complaint is about the Council not meeting Mr G’s son’s needs, as set out in his Education, Health and Care Plan, including tending to his medical needs. And not providing alternative education when Mr G’s son could not attend school. We uphold the complaint. The Council was at fault for a delay in reviewing the Education, Health and Care Plan, not providing some of its contents and not considering if the School was meeting as much as it could of the provisions in the Plan. The Council is now providing some Education Other Than at School, which was one of Mr G’s requests. But the Council has agreed to our recommendation it make symbolic payments, as remedies for the family’s injustice.

  • Devon County Council (25 001 742)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: Mrs X complained about delays in the Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment for her daughter, Y. She also complained Y missed education since December 2024. Mrs X said this impacted the family’s mental health and Y missed education. There was fault in the way the Council delayed completing the EHC needs assessment and issuing the plan and did not provide Y with suitable education. This frustrated Mrs X and Y missed education. The Council agreed to apologise and make a financial payment.

  • Tandridge District Council (25 012 488)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged abandoned car because the court is better placed to consider the complaint and it is reasonable to expect him to go to court.

  • West Midlands Combined Authority (25 014 172)

    Statement Upheld Public transport 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about public transport because we are satisfied with the actions proposed by the Authority.

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (25 016 820)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s involvement with her children. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s action to justify us investigating. It would also be reasonable for Miss X to raise any concerns she has about the care and contact arrangements for her children in court.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (25 016 991)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 09-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about business improvement district levy recovery action as it is unlikely we will find fault causing injustice to the complainant and part of the complaint is made late and there are not good reasons to investigate now.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings