Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 54045 results

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (25 005 379)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Private housing 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate the Council’s advice to Miss X’s tenants after she took legal action to end her tenancy contract with her tenants. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Leicestershire County Care Limited (25 005 460)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Care Provider failing to refund money it owed to Mrs Y after the local authority paid it for Mrs Y's care. It has now refunded the funds.

  • West Sussex County Council (25 003 971)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of an Education, Health and Care Plan. This is because parts of the complaint are late, we cannot investigate matters that went to tribunal, and there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

  • London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (25 003 989)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s assessment of her housing register priority. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • Medway Council (25 004 036)

    Statement Upheld Council tax support 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council considered Mrs X’s reported change in circumstances in relation to her council tax support and housing benefit. The Council has agreed to issue formal decisions, enabling Mrs X to use her appeal rights if necessary. This is sufficient to remedy the injustice we would likely find had been caused by its actions if we investigated.

  • London Borough of Hounslow (25 004 065)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate the complaints about the content of an Education, Health and Care Plan, the process the Council used to create it, or delays in the assessment. This is because Mrs X has used her right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (SEND) about these matters and the remaining complaints are late.

  • London Borough of Bromley (25 004 109)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint about a child and family (CAF) assessment because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

  • Surrey County Council (25 004 126)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council was at fault in the process of assessing the complainant’s daughter’s needs and in producing her Education Health and Care plan. The matters about which she complains could have been the subject of an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability, or are not separable from those matters.

  • Liverpool City Council (25 003 638)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about issues around her children being accommodated for a week with extended family. We are unlikely to find Council fault has directly caused significant injustice. We cannot investigate events considered and decisions made within Court proceedings.

  • Cherwell District Council (25 003 655)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Sep-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council refused his request for a Valuation Tribunal appeal decided entirely on the papers to meet his disability-related needs. This is because the complaint overlaps with the role of the Tribunal to decide how to handle the issue.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings