London Borough of Brent (21 010 312)

Category : Environment and regulation > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council restricted the handing out of leaflets and issued one of the complainants with a Fixed Penalty Notice. This is because a defence against the fixed penalty can be raised in court, and they can appeal any decision by the Council regarding consent to distribute leaflets to the Magistrates Court.

The complaint

  1. The complainants, who I will call Dr X and Mr Z, complain that their group was stopped by a Council enforcement officer from handing out religious leaflets in the street without. Mr Z was handed a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Dr X and Mr Z’s complaint that their group were stopped from distributing religious leaflets and that they should be allowed to do so in the future. The Council’s website states that consent must be sought for distributing leaflets in some roads. If the complainants feel they do no need consent, or if consent is refused then they have the right of appeal to the magistrates court. It would be reasonable to expect them to use this right of appeal.
  2. I will not investigate Mr Z’s complaint that he was unfairly issued a FPN for distributing leaflets without permission. This is because the issue of whether an offence has been committed or not is a matter that can only be determined in court and is therefore not an issue we could decide.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Dr X’s and Mr Z’s complaint because a defence against the FPN and an appeal against any decision to restrict the distribution of leaflets can both be raised in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings