London Borough of Merton (23 015 956)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to remove a display step Mr X placed on a relative’s grave. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council failed to notify him before removing a display step he placed on a relative’s grave. He also complained the Council failed to explain why the step was in breach of the Council’s policy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council after he discovered that a display step he had placed on the graves of two close relatives had been removed. He said the Council failed to write to him before taking this action and he wanted an explanation.
  2. The Council did not uphold Mr X’s complaint. The Council told Mr X it sent him policy information citing the requirements for memorials when he became a grave owner and this information was available on the cemetery notice board and the Council’s website. The Council explained that the display steps presented a health and safety risk, and only approved masons could carry out work on memorials. Mr X remained unhappy with the Council’s actions and referred the complaint to the Ombudsman.
  3. The evidence shows the Council has explained why the display steps were removed and previously provided Mr X with a copy of its policy, which lists the conditions under which the Council may remove items from graves. The Council’s policy regarding who can make amendments to memorials is also available on its website. It is therefore unlikely an investigation would lead to a finding of fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings