London Borough of Bromley (21 016 338)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a social worker’s court report and recommendations to the judge in family court proceedings because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains about a social worker’s court ordered report and recommendations to the judge in family court proceedings. This relates to an allegation of domestic abuse against the mother of his children. Mr X says the social worker was corrupt, biased and ignored abuse because the allegation related to an ex-colleague.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about a social worker’s section 7 court report and recommendations to the court. Mr X says the social worker showed bias and failed to carry out a fair and balanced assessment.
  2. The Council told Mr X it would not consider his complaint via its complaints procedure. This is because his complaint was essentially a challenge to a court ordered report. It told Mr X he should raise his concerns with the report to the court during the ongoing court proceedings. It also advised Mr X to seek advice from his legal representative on this.
  3. The Ombudsman cannot consider the contents of reports which are considered in court proceedings.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from considering matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so. This restriction also applies to court reports.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings