Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (21 014 049)

Category : Children's care services > Adoption

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s social workers and their involvement with the complainant’s family. This is because we cannot achieve anything significant by doing so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Ms B, complains that the Council was at fault in its actions towards her and her family, and that this fault led to her daughter being adopted.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms B’s daughter was born in 2018 and was placed in the Council’s care soon after. Following a period in foster care, the Court decided she should be adopted. Ms B complains that the Council’s officers were at fault throughout the period they were involved with her and her daughter. She says her daughter was wrongfully adopted.
  2. Ms B’s complaint has completed the three stages of the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s services. It has been upheld in part.
  3. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because we cannot achieve anything significant by doing so. The issues she has raised have been properly considered under the statutory complaints procedure. The Council has fully accepted the findings and recommendations, including where it has found to be at fault. That being the case there are no grounds for us to reinvestigate the matter.
  4. It is not for the Ombudsman to comment on whether Ms B’s daughter should have been adopted. The Ombudsman cannot investigate what happens in court. The adoption was decided in Court and this places it outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because we cannot achieve anything significant by doing so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings