Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (21 008 930)

Category : Children's care services > Adoption

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to accept a complaint about a pre-adoption assessment because there is nothing significant to be gained by doing so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that the Council declined to consider his complaint about the Council’s initial assessment of his viability as a potential adopter.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B and his husband are the adoptive parents of a child. They put themselves forward as potential adopters for the child’s sibling. Mr B complained to the Council about the content of the Council’s initial viability assessment.
  2. The Council declined to accept Mr B’s complaint on the grounds that it related to matters which were subject to court action. Mr B complains that this was incorrect, as he and his husband were not party to court action.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is nothing significant to be gained by doing so. While it is the case that Mr B and his husband were not party to court action, the child concerned was subject to care proceedings. The Council says that, as directed by the Court, the assessment of Mr B and his husband’s application is in progress. No qualifying decision has yet been made to support or reject the application.
  4. If a negative decision is made, Mr B and his husband will have the right to challenge it. Investigation by the Ombudsman of the Council’s refusal to accept the complaint about the initial viability assessment would add nothing of value to the process. Our involvement is not therefore warranted.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because there is nothing significant to be achieved by doing so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings