Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (21 006 512)

Category : Children's care services > Adoption

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Oct 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about officers’ actions in relation to adoption processes. There are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains about the way an adoption agency on behalf of the Council has acted towards him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council/care provider has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the Council knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the Council of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered comments made on Mr X’s behalf on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says he, and his partner, applied to be adopters. The Council uses an agency to carry out its duties on its behalf. Mr X says officers were rude to them and acted in a racist prejudicial manner towards them. They believe they lost out on adoption opportunities. They say the officers’ actions added to what is always a stressful process.
  2. The Council replied to a complaint about these matters in 2019. It says Mr X did not request the Council escalate his complaint nor did he contact the Council about the same issues until 2021. It says it is happy to reply to any incidents or events in the last 12 months.
  3. We will not investigate a complaint known to Mr X for more than 12 months without good reasons. Mr X says he should not have had to read small print on letters, they have been struggling with the adoption process since and have been grieving. These reasons are not good enough to justify a two year gap in continuing this complaint.
  4. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to use the Council’s complaint procedure first before we can consider any complaint about events in the last 12 months.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply and it is reasonable to expect Mr X to use the Council’s complaint procedure for the newer events.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings