Hampshire County Council (23 016 098)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because Miss Y has already appealed to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complained the Council wrongly pursued her for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) and sent correspondence to an incorrect address despite her details been up to date with the DVLA. She is also unhappy with the Council’s handling of her complaint, which she says was not properly responded to.
  2. Miss Y says she felt harassed by the Council and says has been caused her distress and inconvenience.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal or a government minister or started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6), as amended)
  2. The Court of Appeal confirmed the Ombudsman cannot consider a complaint when the complainant has pursued an alternative remedy, even if it does not provide a complete remedy for the injustice claimed. (R v Commission for Local Administration, ex parte Field [1999] EWHC 754 (Admin))
  3. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.
  4. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss Y has successfully appealed the PCN to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal and the PCN has not been upheld. As she has used her right to appeal to the Tribunal, we cannot by law investigate her complaint even though the Tribunal may not have provided her with a complete remedy for the injustice she has claimed. Consequently, we will not investigate.
  2. As we are not investigating that substantive matter, it is not a good use of public resources to investigate how the Council may have dealt with Miss Y’s complaint. Consequently, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because she has already appealed to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings