Manchester City Council (21 016 942)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about emergency repair work carried out by the Council, which the complainant says caused damage to his property. This is because it would be reasonable for the complainant to seek a remedy through the courts if he believes the Council are liable for the damage. We will not investigate other matters which have not first been through a council’s internal complaints process.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mr X, complains about work carried out to repair a collapsed culvert outside his home. He says the work has caused structural damage to his property and damaged his drive. He also complains about the inconvenience that the work has caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the council knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council are liable for damage to his home.  Only a court can decide if a council is liable for the damage and what compensation must be paid. We cannot determine such legal matters and have no powers to enforce an award of damages. It is therefore reasonable to expect Mr X to pursue a court remedy if the Council does not accept liability for the damage.
  2. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the works have caused him an inconvenience. This is because the Council has not had the opportunity to fully consider the complaint through its complaints process. The Council did provide Mr X with a response to his complaint and invited him to escalate the matter to the final stage of its complaints process. However, he did not and the complaint was closed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to seek a court remedy for any damage to his property and because the Council has not had an opportunity to fully consider other elements of his complaint through its complaints process.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings