Herefordshire Council (23 017 462)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mrs X’s question at a public meeting as there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council failed to follow its Constitution when it did not read out her question at a Council meeting or provide an oral response to her question. Mrs X says this discriminated against her as a partially sighted person. Mrs X feels the Council should read out all questions so that other partially sighted people can engage in Council meetings.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant, the rules for Council meetings in the Council’s Constitution document, and a recording of the Council meeting in question.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. At the meeting in question, the chairperson explained that, due to time restrictions, those questions provided in writing prior to the meeting would not all be read out but would be displayed on screen at the meeting. Mrs X’s question was displayed on screen and the relevant Member said a written answer would be provided after the meeting.
  2. I have not seen evidence to indicate this was fault. I can see no requirement in the Constitution for public questions to be read out at meetings and the chairperson is also given discretion as to how they manage the taking of questions at Council meetings. The Constitution allows for answers to be provided in writing.
  3. While I recognise why Mrs X is dissatisfied, I do not consider there is evidence of fault by the Council and as such, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings