City of Doncaster Council (23 015 768)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a data breach. The Information Commissioner is best placed to consider the matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council shared his personal data with his neighbours and lied about doing so, causing altercations and stress. He wants the Council to take disciplinary action against the responsible members of staff.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s complaint relates to information he says the Council wrongly shared with his neighbour, in breach of the General Data Protection Regulation.
  2. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the body that considers how organisations handle people’s personal information. The Council rightly signposted Mr X to contact the ICO.
  3. There is not a wider complaint within our jurisdiction, nor is Mr X seeking a remedy that only we, and not the ICO, could achieve. It is reasonable for Mr X to raise his concerns with the ICO, as it is best placed to consider the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner is best placed to consider the matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings