Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (23 014 575)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jan 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council planting a tree in the public highway in 2018. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council planting a tree in the footway of the road where he lives which he says is an unsuitable location for a tree of this variety. He has been complaining since 2019 to have it removed as it is causing damage to his wall and the footway and deposits debris on cars and land around it.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council planted a tree in the footway outside his neighbours home six years ago. He protested at the time that the variety of tree, an alder, was not correct for the location due to its potential to grow to large size and spread and that this could cause future problems.
  2. Since the tree was planted, he says the Council was required to replace damaged paving stones with tarmac and that his front wall has suffered cracking from root damage.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the planting of this tree because it took place six years ago which is outside the 12-month period for receiving complaints. Mr X complained to the Council as long ago as 2019 and it was reasonable for him to complain to us if he was dissatisfied with the outcome. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.
  4. If the tree is currently causing damage to Mr X’s property this is a civil matter and he could submit a claim to the Council’s insurers for negligence. The repair of the highway is a matter for the highway authority who also manage the trees in the public highway.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council planting a tree in the public highway in 2018. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings