Noise


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • London Borough of Enfield (16 018 105)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 11-Sep-2017

    Summary: The Council took appropriate steps to investigate Ms Z's complaint of neighbour noise nuisance.

  • London Borough of Lambeth (16 018 859)

    Statement Upheld Noise 29-Aug-2017

    Summary: Mr A complains the Council was wrong in law not to investigate his complaint about noise nuisance emanating from a car parked near his home under the Environmental Protection Act 1990. There was no fault by the Council in not investigating Mr A's complaint further and as it has accepted that some wording in its guide for the public on reporting noise nuisance needs to be clarified and rewritten there are no grounds which warrant our further investigation of the complaint.

  • Lancashire County Council (16 013 476)

    Statement Upheld Noise 23-Aug-2017

    Summary: There is fault in how the Council investigated Mr X's complaints of noise from a quarry and it delayed in investing those complaints. The Council has appropriately remedied the injustice to Mr X by carrying out its own noise monitoring exercise to determine if the quarry is breaching the planning condition. It has also agreed to remedy the injustice to Mr X caused by its delay in investigating his complaints of noise.

  • Durham County Council (16 011 475)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 22-Aug-2017

    Summary: I do not uphold this complaint as I have found no evidence of fault by the Council in the way it discharged a planning condition and responded to reports of noise

  • Durham County Council (16 018 102)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 21-Aug-2017

    Summary: I do not uphold this complaint as I have found no evidence of fault by the Council in the way it discharged a planning condition and responded to reports of noise.

  • Birmingham City Council (16 015 896)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 10-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's responses to complaints about noise. This is because I have seen no fault in the way the Council has reached its decisions.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (16 018 275)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 07-Aug-2017

    Summary: Mr C complains the Council has failed to properly investigate a noise nuisance. The Ombudsman has not found any evidence of fault by the Council. She has completed the investigation and not upheld the complaint.

  • Maldon District Council (16 006 846)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 02-Aug-2017

    Summary: There is no evidence of fault in how the Council investigated Mr X's report of noise nuisance.

  • Eastbourne Borough Council (16 000 501)

    Statement Not upheld Noise 01-Aug-2017

    Summary: The Council was not at fault in the way in which it investigated Mrs W's reports of unreasonable noise by her neighbours that she considered amounted to statutory nuisance.

  • Bedford Borough Council (17 004 752)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Noise 28-Jul-2017

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr B's complaint about the way the Council has responded to his complaints of noise and dust from a building site. Further consideration of the complaint is unlikely to find fault by the Council.

;