London Borough of Islington (25 008 979)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 18-Dec-2025

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint the Council failed to repair structural damage to her property; or that it mismanaged her son’s benefits. Both these complaints are outside our jurisdiction. We will not investigate her complaint about her neighbour’s use of CCTV, that is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to consider the matter.

Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 008 323)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 17-Dec-2025

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s reports of noise nuisance. This is because the Council responded to these reports in line with its policy and it is unlikely we would find fault in its response.

London Borough of Enfield (24 012 457)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 15-Dec-2025

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council failed to take enforcement action against his neighbour for fly tipping. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

London Borough of Enfield (24 017 695)

Report Upheld Antisocial behaviour 15-Dec-2025

Summary: Mr M complained the Council has not responded in any meaningful way to his reports of anti-social behaviour (ASB) by his neighbour, a council tenant, which includes persistent screaming and shouting at unsociable hours, threats, odours coming from his property, and possible drug abuse. Mr M says he feels unsafe in his own home and is unable to have visitors. He considers the Council should evict the neighbour and ensure he receives care appropriate to his needs.

Chelmsford City Council (25 001 442)

Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 10-Dec-2025

Summary: Mr X complained the Council acted inappropriately when it issued him with a community protection notice for anti-social behaviour. We found fault because there was an issue with the Council’s wording on the notice. This caused Mr X avoidable distress, frustration and uncertainty. To remedy the injustice caused, the Council has agreed to apologise and make a symbolic payment to him.

Wakefield City Council (25 008 206)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 09-Dec-2025

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to reports of antisocial behaviour. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

Cannock Chase District Council (25 009 240)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 09-Dec-2025

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mrs X’s concerns about a neighbours business. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Nottingham City Council (25 007 192)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 03-Dec-2025

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s liability for damage to a property. There is a court remedy available which it is reasonable to expect Mr X to use, and there is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

Blackburn with Darwen Council (25 009 596)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 03-Dec-2025

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue Mr X with a Community Protection Notice (“CPN”). This is because Mr X has used his right of appeal to court.

Bedford Borough Council (25 007 826)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 27-Nov-2025

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X complaint about the Council’s response to his neighbour’s antisocial behaviour. The Complaint is late. We will also not investigate Mr X’s complaint about discrimination by the Council. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify investigating.