Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (23 009 424)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council maintaining restrictions on Miss X ‘s contact with her child’s social worker. Any injustice caused is not sufficient to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X said the Council has unnecessarily maintained restrictions on her contact with her child’s social worker despite her not breaching those restrictions since July 2022.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X’s teenage child does not live with her. The Council imposed restrictions on her communications with her child’s social worker. Miss X said this was in 2020 and she has not breached the communication restrictions since July 2022. The Council’s responses to her complaint support what she has said.
  2. Communication with her child’s social worker is a separable issue from Miss X’s contact with her child and any limits on this, which have been and could again be subject to court action. Restriction of her communications with the social worker would not have prevented Miss X using her right to go to court to seek different contact arrangements with her child, or to challenge the residence arrangements for her child if she saw fit. The injustice to Miss X would thus have been solely an inability to contact the social worker as she wished. That is not sufficient to warrant investigation by us.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because any injustice caused by the Council’s actions is not sufficient to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings