Birmingham City Council (21 016 530)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council refusing to consider Mr X’s complaint. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council was wrong to refuse to investigate a new matter he reported on the ground that it had already dealt with it.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The matter about which Mr X contacted the Council in June 2021 was suicidal ideation by his child. He said the Council was wrong to tell him it had already dealt with this matter in its response to a previous complaint. The context of the complaint is one where the Council removed Mr X’s child from his care some years ago, and Mr X has not been happy with the Council’s care of his child.
  2. I asked the Council for the complaint correspondence. This showed the Council addressed the issue of suicidal ideation in its earlier complaint responses, as it said. Suicidal ideation by Mr X’s child has been and remains a significant concern for the Council, and that it has responded to Mr X about this. That Mr X sent the Council another communication about his child’s suicidal ideation did not oblige it to reconsider the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant this.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings