Manchester City Council (21 018 010)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the delay by the Council to forward Mr X’s housing benefit appeal to a tribunal. This is because the complaint is late and the complainant has now used his appeal rights.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to forward a valid appeal to tribunal. He made the appeal to the Council in 2013.
  2. Mr X complains this caused stressful delays. He would like the Council to apologise and pay him compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Social Entitlement Chamber (also known as the Social Security Appeal Tribunal) is a tribunal that considers housing benefit appeals. (The Social Entitlement Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains the Council did not rightly forward his appeal to tribunal in 2013 when they approached him about HB overpayment. This matter has been dealt with at First Tier Tribunal in 2021.
  2. Mr X submitted an appeal in 2018 which was initially classed as a late appeal but subsequently overturned. This matter has been dealt with at First Tier Tribunal in 2021.
  3. Mr X could have approached us to consider these issues within 12 months of him becoming aware of them. It is reasonable that we might have expected him to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because:
  • It is late and there is no good reason to exercise discretion to investigate it now.
  • There was a right of appeal to a tribunal which Mr X has since used.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings