Corner House Care Limited (23 018 277)

Category : Adult care services > Residential care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about care provided to her late aunt, Mrs C. This is because further investigation could not make a finding of the kind Mrs B wants. Mrs C is now deceased so we could not provide her with a remedy even if we investigated and found evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complained her aunt’s, Mrs C’s, care provider should have called for medical help sooner than it did. Mrs B says the rapid decline in Mrs C’s health should have been monitored closely. Mrs B says Mrs C was admitted to hospital with untreatable kidney damage through lack of hydration. Mrs B says the home should be accountable for contributing to Mrs C’s death and wants a full investigation into her case so this does not happen to another family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We could not make a finding that the Care Provider contributed to Mrs C’s death. Only a coroner can determine this and if concerned open an investigation into the cause of death. The paramedics and health care professionals who, Mrs B says were unable to treat Mrs C because of the lack of hydration, could have raised a safeguarding concern with the Local Authority, if they were concerned any presenting health needs were untreatable due to the actions of a care provider.
  2. The role of the Ombudsman is to remedy injustice caused by fault, however in this case Mrs C is now deceased so we could not provide her with a remedy even if we investigated and found evidence of fault.
  3. Mrs B says she does not want another family to go through a similar experience. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the regulator of care providers. Mrs B can ask the CQC to consider her concerns regarding the responses she says are not a true or honest reflection of what happened, and her belief that the Care Provider is covering up and protecting staff.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because we could not make a finding of the kind she wants or remedy any injustice caused to Mrs C as a result of the Care Provider’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings