Traffic management


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • North East Lincolnshire Council (17 002 483)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 14-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about parking arrangements near the complainant's home. Part of the complaint is made too late and the Council has yet to conclude consultation on possible future changes.

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (16 010 269)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 13-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Council was at fault in failing to properly consider Ms C's individual need for a personalised disabled parking bay and a companion badge. There was fault by the Council in failing to investigate concerns she raised in May and June 2016 about risks to safety caused by uneven paving, raised inspection covers and other issues in her street.

  • London Borough of Bexley (17 001 326)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 12-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that definition of a bus used by the Council does not comply with the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016. He is unlikely to find the complainant has been caused any significant injustice.

  • Milton Keynes Council (16 014 286)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 11-Jul-2017

    Summary: There is no evidence of fault in how the Council reached its decision not to proceed with a residents' parking scheme for Miss X and Mr Y's street following the statutory consultation.

  • Medway Council (17 001 509)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 06-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate any aspect of this complaint about parking restrictions not separate from the complainant's appeal to a tribunal. The Ombudsman will not investigate other issues arising from the complaint.

  • London Borough of Newham (17 003 219)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 05-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about visitor parking permits. There is insufficient evidence of Council fault or that it caused injustice to Mr X.

  • Peterborough City Council (16 014 558)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 27-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Council was at fault by not being able to show it applied the correct criteria at the right time or consulting properly when it agreed to mark up a disabled parking bay outside the complainant's house. The Council has agreed reconsider the application and review its policy.

  • London Borough of Newham (17 002 253)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 21-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Local Government Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate a complaint about the actions of the Council in its role as a social landlord

  • London Borough of Croydon (17 000 464)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 21-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X's complaint the Council failed to consult with her about a proposed traffic order. There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council carried out its consultation. The Council has recognised the problems Ms X has described and there is nothing significant the Ombudsman's involvement could add to the process at the present time.

  • London Borough of Croydon (16 018 697)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 21-Jun-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint the Council failed to consult with him about a proposed traffic order. There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council carried out its consultation. The Council has recognised the problems Mr X has described and there is nothing significant the Ombudsman's involvement could add to the process at the present time.

;