Other


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • London Borough of Redbridge (17 002 841)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 13-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's refusal to allow a vehicle crossover at the complainants' home. It is unlikely he would find fault in how the Council made the decision

  • Sheffield City Council (16 017 095)

    Statement Upheld Other 13-Jul-2017

    Summary: Mr C says the Council failed to renew his driveway in 2016 when carrying out works to the highway. He also states the Council did not fully reply to his complaint. The Ombudsman has found evidence of fault in the Council's complaint response. However it has acted correctly regarding the works to the highway. She has completed the investigation and upheld the complaint because the Council has now offered its apologies for its error.

  • Poole Borough Council (17 004 243)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's decision not to adopt the complainant's proposals for changes to the parking arrangements in his road. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. In addition, the Ombudsman does not determine whether parking signs are lawful - that is a matter for the courts.

  • South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (17 004 451)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Jul-2017

    Summary: Mr Y seeks compensation for damage to his car caused, he says, by a Council contractor. We will not investigate as it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to seek compensation through the courts. The complaint is therefore outside our legal remit.

  • Suffolk County Council (17 000 049)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 07-Jul-2017

    Summary: Mrs X complains about the Council's consultations and decisions to introduce shared space schemes on roads in the County. This is a late complaint as Mrs X knew about such issues for many years. There are no good reasons to persuade the Ombudsman to look at the complaints now.

  • Torbay Council (17 003 408)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 06-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's refusal of the complainant's application for a resident's parking permit. The complainant is not a resident and the Ombudsman is unlikely to find fault by the Council.

  • Kent County Council (17 003 381)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 04-Jul-2017

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs Y's complaint about damage to her car which she holds the Council responsible for. The complaint is outside our legal remit as it is reasonable to expect Mrs Y to take legal action against the Council.

  • Buckinghamshire County Council (17 004 040)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 04-Jul-2017

    Summary: It is reasonable to expect Mr Y to seek compensation in the courts for damage to his car from a pothole. This complaint is therefore outside our legal remit and we will not investigate.

  • Hartlepool Borough Council (16 008 327)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Jul-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about parking problems in the street where the complainant lives. It is unlikely he would evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Northamptonshire County Council (16 013 302)

    Statement Not upheld Other 30-Jun-2017

    Summary: There is no fault with how the Council has considered a request for a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order. There is also no fault with how it handled Mr and Mrs X's complaint.

;