Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Lincolnshire County Council (23 016 301)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 05-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning enforcement matter. This is because the Council has explained the issue is for the relevant district or borough council and I have seen no evidence of fault affecting its view on this point. It is therefore unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mr X by investigating further.
-
London Borough of Enfield (23 018 101)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 05-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control. This is because it is not yet possible to determine if the complainant has suffered any significant injustice.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 05-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to take action against an unauthorised change of use for premises in Ms X’s area. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.
-
London Borough of Bromley (23 011 436)
Statement Not upheld Enforcement 04-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this late complaint about the Council’s decision not to enforce against a structure Mr X says breaches planning control. There is not a good reason for the delay in bringing the matter to the Ombudsman.
-
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (23 014 199)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 04-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about planning permission because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.
-
City of York Council (23 016 035)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 01-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the contents and issue of a warning letter for an alleged breach of planning control. This is because the Council’s actions did not cause Mr X significant injustice warranting an investigation.
-
Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (23 012 434)
Statement Not upheld Enforcement 01-Mar-2024
Summary: X complained about a planning decision relating to land next to their home. We ended our investigation because it was unlikely we would find fault, recommend a remedy, or achieve any other meaningful outcome.
-
Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (23 013 260)
Statement Not upheld Enforcement 01-Mar-2024
Summary: X complained about how the Council dealt with a planning and listed building enforcement issue. We did not investigate this complaint further because we were unlikely to find significant fault, recommend a remedy or reach any other meaningful outcome.
-
Slough Borough Council (23 013 899)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 01-Mar-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control. This is because we are unlikely to find fault and we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant wants.
-
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 015 752)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 29-Feb-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of planning and building control matters which date back a number of years. This is because the complaint is a late complaint and so falls outside our jurisdiction to investigate.