Leeds City Council (21 017 796)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council has refused to take planning enforcement action against a beauty salon operating from a residential property near the complainant’s home. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, says the Council should take planning enforcement action against a beauty salon which is operating from a residential property near his home. He says there are multiple cars coming and going, which causes chaos and stress for other residents trying to park.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. The Ombudsman does not provide a right of appeal against a Council’s planning decision. And we cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council says its Planning Enforcement team investigated the business use of the residential property. It concluded the nature and scale of the business did not amount to a material change of use, so did not require planning permission.
  2. I appreciate Mr X disagrees with the Council’s decision not to take any further action, but the Ombudsman cannot question that decision unless there is evidence of fault in the way it was made.
  3. I see no evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its judgement so, with reference to paragraph 2 above, the Ombudsman will not start an investigation into the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision on the alleged breach of planning control.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings