Lancaster City Council (21 015 518)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council has taken no enforcement action against an outbuilding erected by the complainant’s neighbour. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, says the Council should take planning enforcement action against an outbuilding erected in his neighbour’s garden.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council, which included the related complaint correspondence.
  2. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Parliament has given a blanket planning permission (‘permitted development’) for many minor works, including outbuildings. Subject to the specific nature of the works, local planning authorities have no control over these matters.
  2. The Council has visited the neighbouring property and concluded the structure benefits from permitted development rights. It says it will make another visit once the structure is complete, to check compliance with the permitted development criteria.
  3. I appreciate Mr X wants the Council to take enforcement action against the structure, but is has no power to do so.
  4. As I see no evidence of fault in the way the Council has investigated this matter, the Ombudsman will not pursue the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings