Plymouth City Council (21 014 758)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mrs X’s neighbour’s encroachment onto her party wall and land. This is a private matter, and it is reasonable for her to seek a remedy in the courts if she cannot obtain a civil agreement under the Party Wall Act 1996.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about her neighbour building a new garage which incorporates the line of the existing party wall between her property and theirs. She asked the Council to take planning enforcement against her neighbour. Tt told her that the development does not require planning consent so it cannot take action over a private boundary dispute.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X says her neighbour built a second garage on top of her shared party wall without giving her any notification or obtaining her consent. She has sought legal advice from her house insurers and a separate solicitor. She asked the Council as local planning authority to take enforcement action against her neighbour.
  2. The Council told Mrs X that the garage falls within permitted development rights, and it has no authority to take action against her neighbour. The encroachment on her land is a private matter and she should seek a determination under a private Party Wall Act award or civil action against her neighbour for the boundary issue.
  3. Mrs X says she has been threatened by her neighbour if she seeks a legal remedy against him.
  4. We cannot determine private boundary disputes and the Council has no planning interest in the matter because planning approval is not required for the development. Mrs X should seek a legal remedy and contact the police if she is threatened with criminal actions by her neighbour.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about Mrs X’s neighbour’s encroachment onto her party wall and land. This is a private matter and it is reasonable for her to seek a remedy in the courts if she cannot obtain a civil agreement under the Party Wall Act 1996.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings