Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (21 014 748)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council deciding it cannot take action against work carried out by the complainant’s neighbour. We are unlikely to find fault affected the Council’s decision.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Mrs B, says the Council will not take action against work carried out by her neighbour. She says alterations to the neighbour’s garden have led to flooding in her garden. Mrs B also complained a Council officer told her to wear a face mask during a site visit.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached that is likely to have affected the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B and the Council. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council did not ignore Mrs B’s concerns. However, having visited the site, it decided the work carried out by her neighbour did not require planning permission and ss it could not take any action. This was a matter for the Council’s planning officers’ professional judgement; we do not provide a right of appeal against the Council’s decision.
  2. It appears there was an issue raised about face coverings during the site meeting. However, this is not something that would warrant investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because we are unlikely to fault by the Council has caused her injustice which would justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings