Archive has 987 results
-
Tendring District Council (21 017 431)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to a planning application in the village where the complainant lives. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement. Nor do we consider the complainant has suffered significant, personal injustice.
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 18-Mar-2022
Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for two dwellings next to his property. We have not found the Council to be at fault. It considered Mr X’s objections to the application when granting permission. As there was no fault in the process, we cannot question the merits of the Council's decision.
-
Leeds City Council (21 017 292)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 18-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application or a possible breach of planning control. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
Brentwood Borough Council (21 017 396)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 18-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his neighbour’s planning application in 2019. This is because the complaint is late.
-
Stratford-on-Avon District Council (21 016 223)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 17-Mar-2022
Summary: Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council decided to grant planning permission for development in its area. This is because there is no evidence of fault in how the Council made its decision.
-
London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (21 016 572)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 17-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of the Community Infrastructure Levy process. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council administered the process.
-
Northumberland County Council (21 016 741)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 17-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
Bedford Borough Council (21 002 339)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 17-Mar-2022
Summary: Mr X complains about how the Council handled his neighbour’s retrospective planning application for two air conditioning units’ installation. The Council was at fault for failing to carry out a night-time noise assessment. As a result, it failed to consider the impact the air conditioning units’ installation would have on Mr X’s amenity. This caused Mr X distress, inconvenience and time and trouble. Council has agreed to remedy the injustice caused.
-
Ribble Valley Borough Council (21 009 355)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 17-Mar-2022
Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application for development on land behind his home. We ended our investigation as it was unlikely to result in a finding of fault or achieve a meaningful outcome for Mr X.
-
London Borough of Enfield (21 012 655)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 17-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse a planning application for a dropped kerb. This is because Ms X had appeal rights to the Planning Inspectorate which we would reasonably have expected her to have used.