Service improvements

Suffolk County Council

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for Suffolk County Council as a CSV file.

  • Suffolk County Council (22 016 913)

    Category: Children's care services Date: 10-Oct-2023

    Summary

    There was no fault the Council was intending to close down the support it was providing to Mr X’s family. There was fault that it closed it prematurely because of its poor communication. There was also fault the Council did not share the updated assessments on the support it was providing with Mr X. The Council accepted these faults and have offered Mr X a sufficient personal remedy for this injustice. It has also agreed to take additional steps to improve how it communicates with service users to prevent a reoccurrence.

    Service improvements

    The Council was at fault because it was not able to show how it openly discussed and took into account the complainants views and agreed a support plan while it was providing him with support as a parent of adopted children. The recommendation is to remind all staff of the importance of sharing assessments to ensure it obtains adoptive parent’s views on support.

  • Suffolk County Council (22 007 108)

    Category: Children's care services Date: 25-May-2023

    Summary

    Miss F complained the Council has failed to provide adequate respite provision for her son who is a child in need. She also says the Council significantly delayed responding to her complaint and it has failed to provide an appropriate remedy for her and her son’s injustice. We find fault with how the Council dealt with the respite provision and for its delays in responding to Miss F’s complaint. The Council apologised to Miss F and offered her a suitable financial remedy. This is a sufficient for her and her son’s personal injustice. The Council agreed to implement service improvements when it considered Miss F’s complaint, which it has agreed to evidence. It has also agreed to our further recommendation to make another service improvement to address the significant delays during the statutory complaints procedure.

    Service improvements

    The Council will review the operation of its statutory complaints procedure to identify where it can make changes to prevent delays.The Council will provide us with evidence it has reviewed its link family provision.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings