Transport for London (25 017 706)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Transport for London’s failure to provide its auto-pay records from July 2024. This is because the issue does not cause Ms X significant injustice, and it is unlikely we could achieve the outcome Ms X wants.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains Transport for London (TfL) has failed to provide details and evidence of four trips into the ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ) in July 2024. She says she drives in the ULEZ for work but was not working in July 2024, so she is curious as to where in the ULEZ she drove on the relevant dates.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and TfL.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not investigate all the complaints we receive. In deciding whether to investigate we need to consider various tests. These include the alleged injustice to the person complaining and whether we can achieve any meaningful outcome for them. We only investigate the most serious complaints.
  2. It is not a good use of resources to investigate this complaint simply to confirm where Ms X drove on four occasions in July 2024, which she says is all she wants from her complaint. The amount of these charges was only £50 and this is not a significant amount. In any event, TfL confirms it no longer holds this information in accordance with the terms and conditions of its ‘auto-pay’ service so it is unlikely we could achieve the outcome Ms X wants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the issue Ms X complains about does not cause her significant injustice, and it is unlikely we could achieve the outcome she wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings