Kent County Council (24 023 248)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to close a road and that the Council ignored concerns of residents and other councillors. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to consider the late complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision to close a road. She says the Council ignored the concerns of residents and other councillors and steamrolled the closure through. She also complains about a lack of transparency regarding section 106 funding.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council/care provider has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the organisation knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the organisation of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), section 34(B)6)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision to close a road near a junction. The Council explained a temporary closure of the road was implemented under an experimental traffic regulation order in March 2022.
  2. Following a six-month consultation period, the Council said it reviewed the outcomes and confirmed the permanent closure in September 2023.
  3. Therefore, the matters Mrs X complains about happened more than 12 months ago. Mrs X has not provided any good reasons for why she did not complain about the issues earlier. Therefore, I will not exercise discretion to consider the late complaint.
  4. Mrs X also complains about a lack of transparency regarding section 106 funding. The Council confirmed it had not responded to this complaint and confirmed the closure of the road did not receive any section 106 funding. Therefore, we will not consider this matter as the complaint is premature. It is open to Mrs X to complain to the Council and to give it the opportunity to respond to the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to consider the late complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings