East Sussex County Council (22 003 069)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Jul 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions as consultee on a planning application. There is inadequate evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I shall refer to as Mr X, says the Council attached an unnecessary condition to its comments on an outline planning application. He says this resulted in the Council’s suggested road safety conditions not being attached to the eventual planning permission.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The local planning authority (LPA) consulted the Council on highway matters for an outline planning application for 85 homes.
  2. The Council advised what matters it would like secured through a legal agreement attached to the planning permission.
  3. The LPA refused the planning application. The developer appealed. The Planning Inspector held a public inquiry. The Inspector decided to allow the appeal. She chose not to attach any conditions which include the measures suggested by the Council to the planning permission.
  4. The Planning Inspectorate confirms the Council’s responses to the consultation were available to the Inspector before she made her decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.
  2. The decision not to include the Council’s desired measures to the planning permission was made by the Planning Inspectorate which is outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings