Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (20 003 372)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Sep 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B’s complaint about road obstructions and parking enforcements. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms B says there are obstructions to the road, walkway and her driveway because of lack of pavements.
  2. Ms B says the Council did not deal with her concerns and complaint in a timely manner.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the information Ms B provided and the Council’s response to it. I issued a draft decision to Ms B and invited comments before I made my final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms B complains about cars and vans parking and obstructing her driveway, the road and footway. Ms B says this is because there are no pavements on the road. Ms B says this causes hazards and she wants the Council to take enforcement action over the parking problem.
  2. The Council says there are no formal parking restrictions in place for the road Ms B complains about, so it has no enforcement powers to stop vehicles from parking on the road. The Council says it is a matter for the police and it has put forward a request to the police to consider.
  3. The Council is responsible for Civil Parking Enforcement about areas which have designated signage and parking restrictions. Parking on public roads with no restrictions is a matter for the police as a matter of road traffic law. It is not a council function.
  4. Ms B also complains the Council did not deal with her concerns and complaint in a timely manner. The Council has apologised to Ms B for its delay in responding to her concerns. If the Ombudsman is not investigating the matter in a complaint, we will not separately consider the way the Council responded to it.
  5. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant the Ombudsman investigating this matter and we cannot achieve the outcome Ms B wants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings