Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (19 015 351)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Feb 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about parking bays opposite her driveway which make it difficult for her to exit her driveway. This is because it is unlikely the Council is at fault.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council will not remove parking bays which are opposite her driveway. Miss X says these make it difficult for her to exit her driveway.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants or there is another agency best placed (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Miss X said in her complaint and the comments she made in response to my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Miss X complains about parking bays opposite her driveway which she says make it difficult for her to exit her driveway. Miss X wants the Council to remove the parking bays.
  2. The Council says the bays have been in place since 1993 and it does not consider they should be removed as it could displace parking to more inappropriate locations in the area. It also says that the road allows for two way traffic even when cars are parked and that there is nothing in law precluding parking opposite driveways.

Assessment

  1. While I appreciate why Miss X would prefer for the bays to be removed, the Council explains why it will not and I can see no indication of fault in this.
  2. The Council explains that it is not illegal to park opposite driveways but if Miss X considers a parked car is causing an obstruction, then the police are best placed to respond.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. My decision is that the Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely he would find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings