Worcestershire County Council (25 015 021)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to act to remove flags and markings from the public highway because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council:
      1. failed to remove flags and markings from Council owned property (lampposts, mini-roundabouts, etc.) in line with its duties under the Highways Act 1980;
      2. delayed responding to his complaint.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him distress and frustration. Mr X wants the Council to remove the flags and markings.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. In its complaint response, the Council explained it had taken a pragmatic approach to removing unauthorised flags and markings in its area.
  2. The Highways Act 1980(s132)(2) states:
    • “The highway authority for a highway may… remove any picture, letter, sign or other mark…painted or otherwise inscribed or affixed upon the surface of the highway or upon any tree, structure, or works on or in the highway.”
  3. The Act gives the Council a power (“may”), not a duty (“must”), to remove the described items. The Council has chosen not to do so in every infraction using its discretion. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making, and so we will not investigate this complaint.
  4. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue. Therefore, we will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council handled his complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings