Medway Council (25 014 055)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about flags appearing in public spaces. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault and Mrs Y has not suffered significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complains about the large number of flags in her local area which have been placed by residents.
  2. She says the flags incite racial tension and are a distraction to drivers. Mrs Y says the Council should remove the flags.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Y contacted the Council with her concerns about the large number of flags in her local area.
  2. The Council did not respond to Mrs Y’s complaint directly. It said this was because the removal of flags was part of a wider project and it was unable to respond to individual requests at the time.
  3. There is no duty in law on the Council to remove items attached to its street furniture. We could therefore not say if removing them or leaving them in place amounts to fault by the Council.
  4. Mrs Y is concerned about the flags. However, there is no evidence of her suffering significant injustice to warrant us using time and public money to investigate this further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision and Mrs Y has not suffered significant injustice to warrant us investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings