London Borough of Ealing (25 008 495)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council installing a sign outside the complainant’s home. There is not enough evidence of fault that would justify investigation by the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council put up a sign outside her house without consultation. She said the sign was adjacent to her wall and may impact the value of her property. She would like the Council to remove the sign, or move it to a different location.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s complaint response.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X noticed the Council had put up a shared cycleway road highway sign outside her property in 2025. She complained to the Council about the placement of the sign and how part of the sign overhung her front wall. Ms X questioned whether the sign was necessary because the shared cycleway had signage at the start and the end of the route.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council noted that although it did not need permission to place signs on the public highway, it would try to accommodate residents’ wishes and concerns about signage. It said it had adjusted the sign so that it no longer encroached Ms X’s front wall.
  3. The Council also clarified the sign was required to help alert passengers alighting from buses at a nearby bus stop to the shared cycleway. It noted there had been a full consultation about the shared cycleway scheme before it was constructed.
  4. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault. The Council responded to Ms X’s complaint, adjusted the sign so it did not encroach her property, and provided an explanation as to the sign’s necessity and location.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings