Devon County Council (24 011 078)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to repair damaged bollards and its handling of the matter. There is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and any injustice to Mr X is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s decision not to repair damaged bollards. He feels they are unsightly and dangerous. He also complains about delays in receiving a response from the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its complaint response, the Council said it investigated the issue and found any damage to the bollards was not a safety defect requiring intervention under its policy. It told Mr X it would continue to monitor the situation.
  2. I appreciate Mr X is unhappy, however there is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision so we cannot question the outcome. Further, I do not consider that the damage to the bollards or the delay in responding to Mr X has caused him a significant enough injustice to justify our involvement. Therefore, I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault or significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings