Bristol City Council (21 006 815)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to install anti-skateboarding studs in its city centre. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating and no evidence that Mr X has been caused an injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to install anti-skateboarding studs at the Cenotaph. He said the studs were trip-hazards especially for disabled and visually impaired people, putting them at risk of injury. Mr X wants the Council to remove the studs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating,
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council started to install anti-skateboarding studs two-years ago. In its complaint response to Mr X it said:
    • the size of the studs did not meet the criteria for a trip hazard;
    • it informally discussed the introduction of the studs with disability groups; and
    • it followed due process in its decision to install the stoppers.
  2. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant further investigation.
  3. There is also no evidence the Council’s decision to install the anti-skateboarding studs has caused Mr X an injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions, or that he has been caused an injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings