Norfolk County Council (21 018 568)

Category : Transport and highways > Rights of way

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s handling of matters relating to a public right of way and a Modification Order affecting land close to her property. We will not investigate the complaint because the case has been referred to the Planning Inspectorate for determination and so falls outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Ms X, complains the Council has acted unreasonably in its handling of matters relating to a dispute about a public right of way and a Modification Order application submitted by an organisation whose members seek to access the land the subject of the dispute.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X, including the Council’s response to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The restriction highlighted at paragraph 3 applies to this complaint. The Council has received competing Modification Order applications, including one from Ms X, and it has referred the applications to the Planning Inspectorate for determination.
  2. As this is the case, Ms X’s complaint falls outside our jurisdiction and will not be investigated. This restriction will still apply even after the Planning Inspectorate has made its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the case has been referred to the Planning Inspectorate for determination and so falls outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings