Northumberland County Council (21 009 366)

Category : Transport and highways > Rights of way

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s closure of a footpath used by Mr X. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council or injustice caused to Mr X to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, complains about the Council’s handling of the temporary closure of a footpath close to his home and regularly used by him. He says it has not dealt with this matter in accordance with conditions attached to a planning permission and that it misled him and did not deal properly with his complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. There has been some confusion in relation to the numbered footpath the subject of the temporary closure order and a nearby unnumbered path which had no protection under planning conditions.
  2. The Council says an alternative route for the numbered footpath covered by the planning condition was provided but that no alternative route was provided for the separate closure order relating to the unnumbered path.
  3. While reference to these two separate paths may not have been clear, either by the Council or the complainant, neither fault by the Council nor the injustice caused to Mr X is sufficient to warrant a formal investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council or injustice caused to Mr X to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings