Transport for London (25 013 084)

Category : Transport and highways > Public transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Transport for London sign, which Mr X considers misleading. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains a sign put up by Transport for London (TfL) at a train station was misleading and meant he believed he had a valid ticket for travel when he did not. As a result he received a fine. He wants TfL to remove the sign and refund his penalty fare.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. From the information provided it appears Mr X interpreted the sign to mean that he could travel on National Rail services and the London Underground by tapping his card to pay both fares. However this is not what the sign says.
  2. The sign is also adjacent to another warning of penalty fares for not buying a valid ticket for travel on National Rail services. So Mr X was on notice about the consequences of not having a valid ticket and it was his responsibility to ensure he paid the relevant fares.
  3. TfL cannot control how Mr X interpreted the sign and I do not find it misleading in the way Mr X claims. We are therefore unlikely to find fault by TfL or to say it must reimburse Mr X for the cost of the penalty fare.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because we are unlikely to find fault by TfL or to say its sign caused the injustice Mr X claims.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings