Transport for London (23 006 557)

Category : Transport and highways > Public transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Sep 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty fare because there is another body better placed to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Authority issued a penalty fare for failure to have a ticket or pass while travelling on a train. Mr Y appealed to the Appeals Service (AS) but he has complained that it would not accept evidence for his appeal as it was after the deadline, however Mr Y says he did not receive an email to tell him when the deadline was. He has also said members of staff were disrespectful.
  2. Mr Y says he feels unfairly treated and has now been asked to pay an increased penalty of £80.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y was issued with a penalty fare in May 2023 by the Authority. He says this was wrongly issued. He appealed this to the Appeals Service (AS). His appeal was unsuccessful.
  2. He has complained also that the AS has not considered his appeal properly as evidence was received after a deadline, he was not aware of.
  3. Where a person has concerns about the way an appeal has been handled, they can raise this with London Travelwatch, which is a free service. This body was set up to consider such concerns and so is better placed than us to consider this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because there is another body better placed to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings