Transport for London (22 002 190)

Category : Transport and highways > Public transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a personal injury claim. This is because the courts are better placed to consider this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complains the Authority has unfairly refused her personal injury claim after a train door closed on her. Mrs Y says she received four months of physiotherapy for her injuries and feels nervous travelling on the train since the accident.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mrs Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Y complained to the Authority after train doors closed on her in August 2020. The Authority referred the matter to its insurer. The insurer refused Mrs Y’s claim for personal injury at the end of April 2022. Mrs Y then approached us in May.

Analysis

  1. The legislation from which the Ombudsman takes their power also places some restrictions on what we may investigate. One of these concerns negligence claims about damage to property or personal injury. We cannot determine liability claims for negligence. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts.
  2. Consequently, any claim for personal injury, which Mrs Y considers the Authority to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts. It is therefore reasonable for Mrs Y to pursue her claim through the courts. We will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because the courts are better placed to consider this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings