Brighton & Hove City Council (26 005 562)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to suspend disabled parking bays in a specific area between January 2026 and March 2026. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council:
      1. suspended disabled parking bays in an area it is responsible for between January 2026 and March 2026; and
      2. failed to consider its duties under the Equality Act 2010 when making the decision to suspend parking.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him distress and frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council temporarily suspended the parking bays due to construction work in the area. It considered the impact on disabled users and whether it could provide alternative parking but decided it could not. It deliberately conducted the work at a time of year when traffic and parking demand is generally low.
  2. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  3. We cannot find that an organisation has breached the Equality Act. However, we can find an organisation at fault for failing to take account of its duties under the Equality Act.
  4. Based on the information available, there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman. It considered the relevant factors when it suspended the bays. Consequently, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings