London Borough of Ealing (25 017 264)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because he has the right to appeal to the London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council did not respond to him when he submitted a representation in his own name and instead communicated with the registered keeper of the vehicle – a hire company. He says he was not aware of the charge notice and he was deprived of his right to approach the London Tribunals.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) to the registered keeper of the vehicle, a hire company. Mr X sent representations to the Council. When the hire company gave the Council a copy of the hire agreement, it reissued the PCN, outlining how to appeal.
  2. Mr X said he sent representations, but the Council said it did not receive this. It reduced the charge to £80. Mr X paid. The Council told Mr X he can appeal to the London Tribunals.
  3. Parliament has provided a statutory appeal process for motorists to challenge PCNs to parking adjudicators at independent tribunals, in this case, London Tribunals. We are not empowered to do this and are not another level of appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has a right of appeal to the London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings